South Africa’s High Court has cleared President Cyril Ramaphosa of lying to parliament about the source of donations to his 2017 campaign to lead the ruling party, setting aside a potentially damaging report by a powerful anti-graft watchdog. The high court judges described the watchdog’s approach as based on a mistaken and “fatally flawed” reading of the law. The case was seen by many analysts as a proxy of the bitter power rivalry inside the ANC between supporters of Ramaphosa and his scandal-plagued predecessor Jacob Zuma. Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane had alleged in July that Ramaphosa deliberately misled parliament about the $32,500 donation for his campaign to succeed Jacob Zuma as head of the ruling frican National Congress (ANC). In her report she said there was also prima facie evidence of money laundering involving millions of rand in the handling of the donations, sparking an angry response from Ramaphosa, who swiftly challenged the legality and motivation of the report.
SOURCE: REUTERS AFRICA
A Great Recognition for the Work of Female Peace Builders in Cameroon
Could An Online Gathering Solve South Africa’s Putin Problem?
Calls For African Countries to Create Champions in Key Sectors
Times Higher Education Impact Ranks University of Johannesburg as on Track to Reach SDGs
Ghana’s Appetite for Hand-me-downs Ends Up in Crucial Waterways
Lilongwe is Taking a Closer Look at Who is Granted Asylum
Tanzania and Australia Forge Closer Ties in the Mining and Energy Industries
Kenyans Bemoan Plans to Raise Taxes
Building a Dynamic Ecosystem of Innovative Entrepreneurs and Startups in Libya
What Happened to Cause Musicians to Leave Ethiopia?
Rukky Ladoja & Building a Responsible Nigerian Fashion Brand
How to Write About Africa: Collected Works’ Shows Binyavanga Wainaina’s Legacy