Many countries in sub-Saharan Africa commit resources to promote agricultural innovations. This is based on the assumption that rural livelihoods are mainly agricultural and that the innovations will increase agricultural production and household income. As resources come under pressure from growing populations and natural resource degradation, governments and donors want to see that agricultural research and innovation has an impact. They want to see “success” and “value for money”. Conservation agriculture in Zimbabwe provides a good example of an innovation like this. This approach to farming has been widely promoted by non-governmental organisations, research institutes and the state. It’s also promoted in other countries of eastern and southern Africa. The method is based on minimal soil disturbance, mulching soil with crop residues, and crop rotation. These are meant to conserve moisture, reduce soil erosion and build up soil organic matter to improve crop yields and rural livelihoods. We wanted to know how this innovation was promoted and implemented in Zimbabwe and how its “success” was framed and assessed. Our study found that there were differences in how farmers and promoters of conservation agriculture defined its success.
SOURCE: THE CONVERSATION
More Stories
Launching a Local Lesotho Airline within the Next Year
Providing Support and Acceleration to Women-owned African Tech Startups
Journos Fight For their Voices to Be Heard
Containing a Measles Outbreak in Harare
African Leaders are Increasingly Aspiring to “Modernise” their Cities
UK to Cut Taxes on Imports from Africa
20 African Countries with the Highest Net Migration Rates
Kenyan Woman’s Campaign to Treat Sickle Cell
The Plight of South African Miners Continues
Odinga Won’t Accept Election Result
Mobile “Play-to-earn” App Enables Gamers of Every Level to Earn Cash in every Match they Play
A Device Designed to Make Computing and Computers Accessible to all Africans