Humanitarian organisations – such as the World Food Programme (WFP) – are increasingly using cash transfers as a way of assisting vulnerable people. They are widely praised for enhancing autonomy, reducing costs, and boosting local markets. And this has encouraged their use. For instance, in 2019, the WFP distributed US$2.1 billion transfers to 27.9 million people. Researcher reveals that the switch to unrestricted cash transfers had robust positive effects on household asset accumulation and subjective well-being. Unrestricted cash gave recipients the option to use their assistance on non-food necessities like clothing, cooking fuel, and school equipment for their children. Moreover, refugees could negotiate for more favourable prices with shopkeepers. Under the restricted programme, refugees could only purchase non-food items by first selling their food for cash, forcing them to sell at below-market prices.
SOURCE: THE CONVERSATION
More Stories
Holding Thumbs for Kenya’s Miracle Birth
New Infrastructure Project Puts Government and Residents at Loggerheads
The Devastating Impact of Boko Haram’s Activities Transcends Nigeria’s Borders
Namibia Not Backing Down on its Gay Laws
How to Get Back Learners Who Dropped Out of School
Liberia Mourns the Deaths of Worshippers
The Rise and Rise of Facebook in Africa
Horrific Blast Rocks Ghana’s Mining Town
Donors Called Out for Bringing Near to Expiration Vaccines
Africa’s Digital Economy Could Contribute $180bn to the Region’s Growth by Mid-decade
Las Vegas Resident’s Three-week Adventure through Egypt
Tunisia Needs “Deep Reforms” Such as Drastically Reducing its Vast Public Wage Bill