Got something to say? Click here to send a mail to Personal Finance and Property editor Kabous le Roux.
Tony Clarke, MD of Rawson Properties, has welcomed the amendments to the Rental Housing Act.
“We are happy that the role of the Rental Housing Tribunal has been clarified, giving the rental housing tribunal the powers of a magistrate's court. Unfortunately, the Tribunal is still unable to evict tenants,” said Clarke.
Clarke explains that landlords have been struggling with the unintended application of the Prevention of Illegal Evictions and Unlawful Occupation (PIE) Act since 2002 when the Appeal Court ruled that it also applies to occupants of rented houses and flats.
“Landlords must go through a tedious and expensive process of eviction and we have been waiting for the promised amendments to the PIE Act for some time.”
Clarke adds that the amended Act tightens the Rental Housing Tribunal’s control of recalcitrant tenants, but criminalises certain methods of 'punishing' the tenant who has defaulted.
“The amended Act protects the tenant’s property and rights to utilities. Landlords that wish to take action against tenants are now forced to do so via the Rental Housing Tribunal.”
Clarke highlighted the following as being the most significant changes:
“The amended Rental Housing Act formalises the relationship between the landlord and the tenant and ensures that there is a Tribunal available to mediate any disputes between parties. The major advantage of the Tribunal as a body for resolving disputes is that it is free of charge. In addition, they have a set deadline by which to resolve matters and judgements are reached much sooner than in the Magistrate Court.
“The only shortcoming that I can see in the above legislation is that, although the tenant’s rights are very much protected and landlords now have a legal recourse to seize possessions, the major problem of tenant eviction still has not been addressed. We hope that the long-awaited PIE Act adjustments will be passed shortly.”