President Robert Mugabe called for the lifting of "illegally imposed sanctions" on his
regime.
Attempt to block Mugabe
Article By:
Fri, 15 Aug 2008 17:05
The Zimbabwean Exiles Forum (ZEF) has lodged an urgent application
to the SADC Tribunal to prevent President Robert Mugabe from attending
the regional body's summit this weekend.
ZEF spokesperson Gabriel Shumba said the application was faxed to the
Southern African Development Community Tribunal in Windhoek, Namibia,
on Friday.
"We expect by now it has already been sent," he said around 1pm.
"Mugabe was not lawfully elected and so he cannot take his seat at
the [SADC] table. It shouldn't require legal action for SADC to
recognise this."
Shumba said it was hoped the tribunal would withdraw Sadc's
invitation to Mugabe to attend the weekend summit of heads of state and
government in Johannesburg and also declare his rule as illegitimate.
The application had only been brought on the eve of the summit as
the forum had not anticipated that Mugabe would be invited because he
was not lawfully the head of state, he said.
"We want
relief... Mugabe must not be recognised as the lawful head
of state."
The Sadc chair was in violation of its principles which were clear
that a state party should act in accordance with its laws and respect
the rule of democracy, Shumba said.
He said Sadc had declared the run-off elections on 27 June not free,
fair or reflective of the democratic will of the people.
"Zimbabwe law says that if [run-off] elections are not held within
21 days, then the Zimbabwean Electoral Commission must declare the
legal winner, in this case Morgan Tsvangirai, as president."
He said the forum, through its legal action to the tribunal, wanted
to "force" Sadc's hand to not recognise Mugabe as the president of
Zimbabwe and to recognise that the elections were unconstitutional.
The application was brought on behalf of the ZEF by the Southern
African Litigation Centre (SALC).
The SALC said it was required under African Union law that the state
party be suspended immediately once there had been an unconstitutional
change in government.
"It makes clear that 'any refusal by an incumbent government to
relinquish power' belongs in the same category of coups d'etat."
SALC director Nicole Fritz said legal action could be brought
against SADC itself in terms of the SADC Tribunal's protocol.
"SADC has repeatedly said it will not recognise unconstitutional
changes in government and we intend holding them to this commitment,"
she said.
The Tribunal's clerk of the court could not be immediately reached
to confirm if the application had been received.